Creation science dating methods

Does carbon dating prove the earth is millions of. - Creation Today

Ngauruhoe, New Zealand, yield a rubidium-strontium “age” of 133 million years, a samarium-neodymium “age” of 197 million years, and a uranium-lead “age” of 3.908 billion years!

YEAR CREATION IS SCIENTIFIC 90% of dating methods.

So what other situations and conditions create unreliable results that we must also throw out the dating because of?

<em>Creationism</em> - pedia

Free Creation Science PowerPoint

The three main assumptions that affect the results of radiometric dating are: 1) the rate of decay has always been constant, 2) there has been no contamination (no movement of elements into or out of the object over time), and 3) we can determine how much daughter element there was to begin with.[ii] There are many test results that make the reliability of these dating ques very questionable.[iii] Naturalists try to explain these questionable results, but still can’t adequately explain them from their worldview.[iv] Evidence from “as far back as 1971” may show “that hh pressure could increase decay rates very slhtly for at least 14 isotopes.”[v] Naturalists even admit that radiocarbon dating does not work on living mussels because of the lack of new carbon in that environment.

Creationism - pedia

We cannot go back into the past to measure all the parameters we need in order to do the dating calculation.How accurate are Carbon-14 and other radioactive dating methods.


Creation science dating methods:

Rating: 94 / 100

Overall: 97 Rates